1st Place, News Story
2021-22, Division 2, News Writing
By Lucas Caswell &
Michael Mychaliska
The Skyline Post
Skyline HS
On November 1, 2022, the Thomas More Law Center filed a lawsuit in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan against Ann Arbor Public Schools (AAPS), Skyline Principal Cory McElmeel, and Skyline Secretary Jefferson Bilsborrow on behalf of a Skyline Parent representing their student and the Skyline Republican Club.
The suit alleges that the Defendants deprived the Plaintiffs of their right to freedom of speech and equal protection under the law and the club’s right to equal access by not allowing the club to make an announcement against Proposal 3.
On November 4, 2022, an expedited hearing was held due to the time-sensitive nature of the case. The court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for an emergency ex parte temporary restraining order which orders the defendants to air a revised announcement.
The original announcement the Republican Club proposed read as follows:
Are you interested in joining our efforts to protect the health of women and children by joining us in our fight to defeat Proposal 3? If proposal 3 is passed it would eliminate health and safety regulations, legalize late term and partial birth abortion, no longer require physicians to perform abortions, and eliminate informed consent laws. If so email us at skylinerepublicanclub@gmail.com
The altered announcement differs in that it omits “by joining us in our fight to defeat Proposal 3.”
In granting the restraining order, Judge Paul Borman found “Plaintiffs have shown a likelihood of success on the merits of their First Amendment claim, and that they therefore have satisfied the requirements for obtaining a temporary restraining order at this early stage of the case.”
The suit alleges that the original announcement submitted on October 21, 2022, was rejected due to its “political nature,” violating an AAPS School Board policy not to advertise political activities. Per the lawsuit, soon after rejecting the announcement, Bilsborrow defended the school’s decision in a meeting with the student. McElmeel affirmed the decision on October 28, 2022, in an email to the student, stating it could not be aired because it violated campaign finance laws, in contrast with the initial reasoning.
The suit alleges that the school allows student groups to share announcements over the public address system but prohibits announcements that express viewpoints with which they disagree.
The plaintiffs are seeking validation of their claims by a judge, a change to AAPS policy, an action that will rectify the alleged unlawful actions, nominal damages, and attorney fees.
In conjunction with the modified announcement being read, on November 7th, AAPS Superintendent Jenice Kerr Swift issued a press release regarding the announcement. It read in part:
“We will continue to vigorously defend this case in court so that clarity in the district process in future situations is consistent with the Michigan Campaign Finance Act and other laws in ensuring the district maintains a viewpoint neutral position, without advocacy, on ballot proposals.”
The Court will issue a full ruling at a later date.
The Post will continue to cover this story as it develops.
NW-02. News Story
News stories should report but not interpret events that have news value and timeliness to the publication’s readers. Advance stories may be included in this category; follow-up stories should be submitted in NW-03. Submit a PDF of the print page(s) on which the story was published or the URL to the story on an online news site.
JUDGING CRITERIA
- Sharp, attention-getting lead that underscores news story importance
- The most important, relevant and timely information is near the beginning of the story
- Emphasizes news elements, i.e. timeliness, nearness, impact, and prominence
- Shows thorough reporting skills; develops an understanding of the issues/problems through interviews with varied and balanced sources
- Effective use of facts/quotes gathered predominantly from primary sources. Secondary sources, if used, are cited appropriately.
- Avoids opinion unless properly attributed
- Sentences, paragraphs of varied length; written clearly, concisely, and vividly
- Proper diction/grammar; use of third person